A clear message to Pakistan, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar declared that the “era of uninterrupted dialogue” is over, emphasizing that actions have consequences

At a recent book launch in New Delhi, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar delivered a strong message to Pakistan, emphasizing that actions have consequences and that the “era of uninterrupted dialogue” with Pakistan is over. Jaishankar made it clear that India’s approach to its relationship with Pakistan has fundamentally shifted. The previous strategy of engaging in dialogue without addressing the core issues, particularly cross-border terrorism, has ended. He stressed that any future engagement between the two countries would be contingent upon Pakistan taking concrete and verifiable steps to curb terrorism.

Jaishankar pointed to the abrogation of Article 370, which revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir, as a definitive move by India that signals its intent to chart a new course in its relations with Pakistan. “As far as Jammu and Kashmir is concerned, Article 370 is done,” Jaishankar said, underlining that India has taken decisive steps in its internal affairs, and expects Pakistan to recognize the new reality.

The minister also addressed whether India is content with maintaining the current state of relations with Pakistan. He suggested that India is neither passive nor indifferent to the developments in its relationship with Pakistan. Jaishankar stated that India will respond to any changes in the situation, whether they take a positive or negative turn, making it clear that India’s stance is dynamic and will be shaped by the actions of its neighbor.

At a separate event, Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy echoed Jaishankar’s sentiments, criticizing Pakistan’s lack of genuine interest in fostering peaceful relations with India. Reddy responded to calls from political parties like the National Conference (NC) and the Congress for renewed talks with Pakistan by highlighting the repeated failures of previous attempts at dialogue, even under leaders such as former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and current Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Reddy argued that despite India’s efforts to establish a peaceful and cooperative relationship, Pakistan has continued to support terrorism and target Indian soldiers. He questioned the feasibility of engaging in dialogue with a country that has consistently shown an intent to harm India. Reddy’s comments reflect the broader frustration within India regarding Pakistan’s persistent support for cross-border terrorism and its impact on bilateral relations.

India has consistently maintained that it desires normal neighborly relations with Pakistan, but this is only possible if Islamabad takes the necessary steps to create an environment free of terror and hostility. The onus, according to Indian officials, is on Pakistan to demonstrate its commitment to peace by taking tangible actions to curb terrorism. Without such actions, the prospects for meaningful dialogue remain slim.

The relationship between India and Pakistan has long been strained, primarily due to the Kashmir issue and the ongoing threat of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. India’s recent actions, including the revocation of Article 370 and its tough stance on dialogue, signal a new approach that prioritizes security and national interest over the previous policy of dialogue at any cost.

Jaishankar’s remarks underscore India’s resolve to hold Pakistan accountable for its actions and to ensure that any future engagement is based on mutual respect and a genuine commitment to peace. The message is clear: India is ready to respond to the changing dynamics of its relationship with Pakistan, but it will not compromise on its security or sovereignty. The era of dialogue without action is over, and Pakistan must now demonstrate its willingness to change its behavior if it wishes to engage with India meaningfully.

Jaishankar declared, signaling a shift from the previous approach of engaging in dialogue without demanding accountability for Pakistan’s actions. This statement aligns with India’s broader policy of prioritizing security and national interest over diplomatic engagement that lacks substantial progress in addressing core issues, particularly terrorism. Jaishankar’s message also serves as a reminder that India’s patience has limits and that the continuation of terrorism emanating from Pakistan will have repercussions on bilateral relations. By linking dialogue with the cessation of terrorist activities, India has set a clear benchmark for future engagement with Pakistan. The message is unambiguous: for any meaningful conversation to take place, Pakistan must demonstrate a genuine commitment to curbing terrorism and ensuring that its territory is not used as a launching pad for attacks against India. The minister’s comments reflect India’s broader strategy of adopting a more assertive posture in its foreign policy, particularly concerning countries that pose a direct threat to its security. By emphasizing the consequences of actions, Jaishankar has reinforced India’s position that it will not compromise on its security or sovereignty. This approach marks a departure from previous strategies that often involved pursuing dialogue in the hope of improving relations, even as Pakistan continued to engage in hostile activities. Jaishankar’s remarks also highlight India’s growing confidence on the global stage, where it seeks to engage with partners who respect its concerns and are willing to address them sincerely. The message to Pakistan is clear: if it wishes to restore normalcy in its relations with India, it must take definitive steps to end terrorism. Only then can there be any possibility of resuming dialogue. This firm stance is also a reflection of the changing geopolitical landscape, where India is increasingly asserting itself as a nation that demands respect for its sovereignty and security concerns. The decision to end the era of uninterrupted dialogue indicates that India is no longer willing to engage in talks for the sake of optics, without ensuring that its fundamental issues, especially terrorism, are addressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *